<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celebs without makeup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.legendarylife.com/celebs-without-makeup/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.legendarylife.com/celebs-without-makeup</link>
	<description>A life of distinction is worth recording!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: james dipadua</title>
		<link>http://blog.legendarylife.com/celebs-without-makeup/comment-page-1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>james dipadua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 05:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.legendarylife.com/celebs-without-makeup/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is there any confirmation that those videos from YouTube (of all places, that can't really be trusted) are legitimate?  I wouldn't even trust images that were cut from a tabloid and scanned on to the net since those could easily just be shots of people who look remotely like a star.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I mean, some of those images do not look like the person in the slightest.  I'm not saying that airbrushing doesn't occur or that the stars don't put on a little extra weight when they're between projects but some were a bit too extreme.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whereas I agree with your reasoning, it seems like some of those shots/frames are a bit dubious.&lt;/p&gt;

----------------

Not really, I have looked at the comparisons rather closely, the facial outlines are about the same, what I think doesn't help is that the pictures are from different times, like that Pamela Anderson shot, I am pretty sure they grabbed a "young" picture of her at her peak and stuck it next to one when she is a few years (at least) older. Bad lighting and maybe reverse airbrushing (to make them look worse) may have made these changes all the more dramatic, no real way of knowing James. Regardless, this stuff is happening and I found these videos to prove my point about how extreme the practice really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any confirmation that those videos from YouTube (of all places, that can&#8217;t really be trusted) are legitimate?  I wouldn&#8217;t even trust images that were cut from a tabloid and scanned on to the net since those could easily just be shots of people who look remotely like a star.</p>
<p>I mean, some of those images do not look like the person in the slightest.  I&#8217;m not saying that airbrushing doesn&#8217;t occur or that the stars don&#8217;t put on a little extra weight when they&#8217;re between projects but some were a bit too extreme.  </p>
<p>Whereas I agree with your reasoning, it seems like some of those shots/frames are a bit dubious.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Not really, I have looked at the comparisons rather closely, the facial outlines are about the same, what I think doesn&#8217;t help is that the pictures are from different times, like that Pamela Anderson shot, I am pretty sure they grabbed a &#8220;young&#8221; picture of her at her peak and stuck it next to one when she is a few years (at least) older. Bad lighting and maybe reverse airbrushing (to make them look worse) may have made these changes all the more dramatic, no real way of knowing James. Regardless, this stuff is happening and I found these videos to prove my point about how extreme the practice really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
